zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. is a Shanghai-based supplier focused on electrical distribution and power-related products, including power supply boxes, industrial portable power units, distribution panel boards, and related electrical components. Based on the provided data, the company demonstrates a solid mid-sized manufacturing profile with a factory area of 3,900+㎡, 160+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and listed operational tags such as Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available. Business performance is commercially meaningful, with 40+ orders and CN¥6.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 5.0 store rating. However, the review base is relatively limited at 20+ reviews, and information on full customization capability and formal factory certifications is insufficient. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established electrical product sourcing with verified platform credibility and reliable delivery performance.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 3,900+㎡
  • Employee count: 160+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope includes power supply boxes, three-phase industrial portable power products, distribution panel boards, and electrical component-related products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable manufacturing base with over 3,900㎡ of factory space and more than 160 employees. This indicates a structured production organization rather than a very small workshop-level operation. The product portfolio shown in the provided data is concentrated in electrical distribution and power-related categories, suggesting a focused industrial product positioning.

The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s operational profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, annual output, number of production lines, machinery list, R&D team size, or formal factory management certifications. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates clear manufacturing capability, the depth of its production scale cannot be fully confirmed beyond the available factory size and workforce data.

Scoring Rationale

The company appears to fit the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. The 160+ staff count and 3,900+㎡ factory area are sufficient to support regular production, and verified supplier status provides additional confidence. However, it does not reach the highest score range because there is insufficient data on large-scale production capacity, advanced manufacturing systems, or factory certifications. The available data supports a stable mid-sized manufacturing assessment.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags: Project solutions, Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 16-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability also adds transaction protection for buyers, which is important in international procurement. The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, further improving confidence in its basic company legitimacy and platform profile.

The listed tags indicate that the supplier presents additional service and quality-related capabilities, including project solutions, warranty availability, OEM-related experience, and finished product inspection. However, the provided data does not specify internationally recognized product certifications, compliance standards, or factory audit reports. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong from a platform perspective, but formal technical certification coverage remains Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier scores highly because it combines long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform tags related to service and inspection. The 16-year Gold Supplier duration is particularly strong. The score is not a full 20 because the provided data does not include detailed third-party audit results, product compliance certificates, or a complete certification list beyond platform tags.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past six months: 40+
  • Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥6.4M+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity. A transaction value of CN¥6.4M+ over the past six months indicates that the supplier has secured commercially significant orders rather than only small trial purchases. The 40+ order count suggests regular transaction activity, though it is not extremely high in order volume.

The store rating of 5.0 is very positive and indicates strong satisfaction among buyers who left feedback. However, the review count is 20+, which is useful but still a relatively limited sample size for fully validating long-term customer satisfaction across a broad customer base. The combination of high transaction amount, moderate order count, and excellent rating supports a strong but not top-tier business performance assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable business validation, especially due to the CN¥6.4M+ transaction value and 5.0 rating. However, the order count of 40+ and review count of 20+ do not fully support the highest scoring range, which would typically require both high order volume and a larger review base. The commercial performance is strong and credible, but not maximized.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Relevant service tags: Project solutions, Warranty available
  • OEM for well-known brands tag: Provided

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates a reasonably efficient communication standard for online procurement. This level of responsiveness is acceptable for international sourcing communication, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour.

The platform tags suggest some service orientation, including project solutions and warranty availability. The “OEM for well-known brands” tag may indicate OEM-related service capability, but the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support. Therefore, customization depth, engineering support, private-label capability, sample development process, and design support remain Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has acceptable service capability based on its response time and listed service-related tags. However, the score is limited because the response time is not within the top service range and there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization. The supplier appears suitable for standard product inquiries and potentially project-based sourcing, but deeper customization capability requires further verification.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that recent orders were dispatched according to agreed timelines on the platform.

However, the data does not include average lead time, peak-season delivery performance, logistics methods, production scheduling capacity, or historical delivery consistency beyond the stated on-time dispatch rate. Therefore, while the available delivery metric is excellent, broader logistics capability remains Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided criterion, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 score range. Since the supplier’s stated rate is 100.0%, it deserves the maximum score for this dimension. No deduction is applied because the scoring rule is directly tied to the on-time dispatch rate.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 20+
  • Finished Product Inspection tag: Provided
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified; detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s 5.0 store rating is a strong quality-related signal from customer feedback. The presence of the Finished Product Inspection tag also supports the existence of some quality control process before shipment. Verified supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s credibility from a platform validation perspective.

However, the number of reviews is 20+, which is positive but not extensive. A larger review base would provide stronger evidence of consistent quality performance across more transactions and buyers. Additionally, the provided data does not include detailed inspection procedures, defect rates, product testing standards, certification documentation, or third-party quality audit reports. As a result, quality assurance appears solid but cannot be considered fully comprehensive based on the current dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a strong score because of its 5.0 rating, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status. The score is not placed in the highest 18–20 range because the review count is still limited and detailed quality system documentation is not provided. The quality profile is favorable, but further verification would be needed for high-risk or specification-sensitive procurement.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with targeted verification before large-volume or highly customized orders.

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing electrical distribution and power-related products who require a supplier with verified platform credibility, stable transaction history, and strong delivery performance. The supplier is particularly suitable for standard product procurement, repeat purchasing, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and long-term Gold Supplier history.

Applicable customer types: - Buyers sourcing electrical distribution boxes, panel boards, and industrial power-related products
- Importers or distributors seeking a mid-sized China-based supplier
- Buyers requiring Trade Assurance-backed transactions
- Customers placing standard or moderately sized orders with delivery reliability requirements

Main risk points: - Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Formal product certifications and factory management certifications are Insufficient Data
- Review count is positive but still limited at 20+
- Detailed production capacity, lead time structure, and quality testing procedures are not provided

Growth potential: The supplier shows strong platform maturity, a solid transaction amount, verified status, and excellent on-time dispatch performance. If it can provide more detailed certification documents, quality control procedures, customization capability evidence, and factory audit materials, it could become more suitable for larger-volume, specification-sensitive, or compliance-driven procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ebasee Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Cet Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linkwell Electric (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linkwell Electric (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amsino Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senwo Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gateo Shanghai Sports Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gateo Shanghai Sports Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yucai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Caiyibiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ranchao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhenjiang Xinya Grinding Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Xinya Grinding Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Decent (Shandong) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Decent (Shandong) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Charming Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Charming Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Aotaier Welding And Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Aotaier Welding And Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Harmony Angel Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Harmony Angel Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Poney Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Poney Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Clean-Link Filtration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yuheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yuheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xicheng Ep Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dechuang Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dechuang Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Auto Sales Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhenmei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhenmei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jialaibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jialaibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhiding Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhiding Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026