zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shengfeng (Hubei) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shengfeng (Hubei) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hubei, with a reported factory area of 3,800+ m² and 30+ staff. The company offers multiple film-related products, including building film, antibacterial membrane, PDLC smart film, custom-size smart film, and PPF/TPH film products. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing capacity, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related platform tags including ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. Commercial activity appears active but still developing, with 70+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.5 with only 9 reviews indicates limited customer feedback depth. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing, customized film products, and suppliers with basic platform protection. Key risks include limited review volume, relatively short Gold Supplier history, and insufficient disclosed quality inspection data.

Shengfeng (hubei) New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Hubei, China.
  • Factory area: 3,800+ m².
  • Employee count: 30+ staff.
  • Verified supplier: True.
  • Product scope includes multiple film products such as building film, antibacterial membrane, PDLC smart film, custom-size PDLC smart film, and PPF/TPH film.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported physical production base of more than 3,800 m² and a workforce of over 30 staff. This indicates an operating manufacturing entity with basic production infrastructure rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The product list also shows involvement in several film categories, including smart film and protective film-related items, suggesting a focused product direction within new material or film applications.

However, the available data does not indicate large-scale production capacity, number of production lines, annual output, machinery details, R&D team size, or warehouse capability. While the verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile, the relatively modest factory size and staff count place the supplier closer to a small-to-medium manufacturer rather than a large-scale industrial supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear evidence of a physical factory, staff, and verified supplier status, which supports a basic manufacturing capability assessment. The 3,800+ m² facility and 30+ staff are sufficient for small-to-medium production operations, but the data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain. Because production scale indicators are present but limited, the company fits the “small to medium factory with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True.
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years.
  • Trade Assurance: True.
  • Certification / industry tags: ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization, Response time ≤2h.
  • Verified supplier: True.

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier membership confirms paid platform participation, while the 2-year duration shows some continuity but not a long-established platform history. Trade Assurance provides a basic transaction protection mechanism for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility because it indicates that the supplier has passed at least some level of platform-related verification.

The certification and industry tags are mainly service and customization related rather than formal third-party product or management certifications. No ISO certification, product compliance certification, export qualification, or factory audit report details are provided. Therefore, while platform credibility is reasonably supported, compliance depth remains partially insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, and the data does not provide detailed factory audit certificates, quality management certificates, or product compliance certificates. This supports a score in the mid-to-upper range, but not the highest range reserved for long-term suppliers with more complete certification systems.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 70+.
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+.
  • Store rating: 4.5.
  • Number of reviews: 9.

Elaboration

The supplier shows active business performance on the platform, with more than 70 orders over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has generated repeated platform transactions rather than having only isolated inquiries or unverified activity. The transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ demonstrates measurable commercial movement, though it is not high enough to indicate a large-scale transaction profile based on the provided data.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable but not exceptionally high. More importantly, the review count is only 9, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad commercial validation indicator. The combination of active orders and moderate transaction value suggests a supplier with developing but not yet deeply proven commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale

The 70+ orders show real business activity, while CN¥202.8K+ in transaction value indicates moderate sales performance. However, the small number of reviews weakens the confidence level in customer validation, and the 4.5 rating is good but not outstanding. The supplier therefore fits the “stable but medium or developing transaction scale” category rather than the high-performance category.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h.
  • Platform tag: Full customization.
  • Platform tag: Minor customization.
  • Platform tag: ODM service available.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability based on the provided platform tags. A response time of no more than 2 hours suggests reasonably efficient communication, which is important for quotation handling, customization discussions, sample confirmation, and order coordination. The availability of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service indicates that the supplier may support different levels of buyer-specific requirements.

However, the strongest scoring range requires response time of ≤1 hour, while the provided data only confirms ≤2 hours. There is also no data on multilingual support, engineering response capability, sample lead time, after-sales process, or dedicated account management. Therefore, service capability appears good, but not enough data is available to classify it as top-tier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear service-related strengths, especially customization support and response time within 2 hours. This is better than basic service capability and suitable for buyers requiring product adaptation. However, since the response time does not meet the ≤1 hour benchmark and additional service process data is not provided, the score should remain in the upper-middle range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 95.6%.

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate of 95.6% is a strong delivery indicator. This suggests that the supplier has generally been able to meet platform dispatch commitments and manage order fulfillment timing effectively. For procurement teams, a dispatch rate above 90% reduces the risk of shipment delays at the order-processing stage.

The available data only reflects on-time dispatch performance, not full logistics performance. There is no information on average lead time, production lead time, international shipping reliability, delay dispute rate, or handling of urgent orders. Therefore, the delivery score should focus specifically on the provided on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 95.6%, the supplier shows strong delivery discipline. Since the data does not include broader logistics or lead-time performance, a high but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5.
  • Review count: 9.
  • Verified supplier: True.
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data.
  • Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified, but detailed factory verification or audit content is Insufficient Data.

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. However, the review count is only 9, so the feedback base is limited. A small review sample makes it difficult to fully assess consistency in product quality, after-sales handling, packaging reliability, or long-term buyer satisfaction.

The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some quality-related credibility at the company level. However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, third-party inspection support, product certificates, defect rate, warranty terms, or inspection records. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully validated from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The 4.5 rating is acceptable, and verified supplier status gives some confidence. However, the low review count and lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection data limit the strength of the quality assessment. The supplier has basic quality credibility but insufficient evidence of a mature quality assurance system, so the score should remain in the lower-middle range of the quality category.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shengfeng (Hubei) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is conditionally recommended for procurement cooperation, especially for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing of film-related products with customization requirements. The supplier is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, responsive communication within 2 hours, and a strong on-time dispatch rate of 95.6%.

The supplier appears most suitable for: - Buyers requiring customized or ODM film products. - Small and medium-sized importers testing product categories or suppliers. - Buyers who value platform transaction protection through Trade Assurance. - Procurement teams placing trial orders before scaling volume.

Main risk points: - Only 2 years as a Gold Supplier, indicating a relatively short platform history. - Limited customer review base with only 9 reviews. - Finished Product Inspection data is not provided. - Detailed factory audit, quality control system, and product certification data are insufficient. - Production scale appears moderate rather than large-scale.

Growth potential is present due to active recent orders, multiple customization tags, and strong dispatch performance. A prudent procurement approach would be to start with sample validation or a small trial order, confirm inspection standards before mass production, and request additional quality documentation before placing larger or long-term orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jingjiang Shengfeng Agricultural Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Shengfeng Agricultural Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qianjiang Kingphar Medical Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Qianjiang Kingphar Medical Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Huanuo Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Huanuo Boiler Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jiangsu Fine Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Fine Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Changlin Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Changlin Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fourfocus Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fourfocus Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Hualun Guanse Decoration Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Anping Dongfu Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Dongfu Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leguwe Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Leguwe Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kayrun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kayrun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiongqian Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiongqian Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumboaudio Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzihao (Fujian) Combustion Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinzihao (Fujian) Combustion Equipments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Aoyu Fluff Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026