Shanghai Hanyang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Hanyang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering insect-catching and fly-trap related products such as yellow glue fly sticks, insect light fly products, moth traps, sticky fly rolls, and disposable fly trap bags. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory area of 5,000+㎡, 20+ staff, and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a basic but credible manufacturing foundation. Its platform profile appears strong, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 100.0% on-time delivery label. Commercial performance is moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, but customer feedback volume is limited, with only 5 reviews and a 4.4 store rating. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established platform credibility, stable delivery, and pest-control product sourcing, while buyers requiring extensive customer feedback or clearly documented quality inspection systems should conduct further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 5,000+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Shanghai, China

Elaboration
Shanghai Hanyang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. has a documented factory area above 5,000㎡, which suggests a physical production or operating base of meaningful size. However, the employee count of 20+ staff indicates a relatively lean workforce rather than a large-scale manufacturing organization. The supplier is marked as verified, which strengthens confidence in the existence and basic legitimacy of the company’s operating setup. The available data does not provide details on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, annual output, factory audit scope, or specific factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company shows a credible production foundation through its factory size and verified supplier status. However, the relatively small staff size and absence of detailed production-capacity data prevent it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It is stronger than a small unverified supplier, but the information supports a mid-to-small manufacturing profile rather than a high-capacity industrial supplier.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has 12 years of Gold Supplier status, which represents a long platform operating history. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transaction-protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status further supports platform-level credibility. The available tags confirm response-time and delivery-performance indicators, but no specific third-party product certifications, factory audit certificates, management-system certifications, or industry compliance documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
A 12-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status create a strong platform credibility profile. The main limitation is that the provided certification labels are operational tags rather than full compliance documentation. Since no product or factory certification details are supplied, the supplier cannot receive a perfect score, but its credibility indicators are clearly above average.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past six-month order volume: 60+
- Past six-month transaction value: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 4.4
- Review count: 5

Elaboration
The supplier has completed more than 60 orders and generated over CN¥1.2M in transaction value during the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. This indicates that buyers are placing orders and that the supplier has a measurable transaction record. However, the review count is very limited at only 5, which reduces the strength of customer-side validation. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not high enough to indicate outstanding customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value reflect stable trading activity, especially for a supplier in a specialized pest-control product category. However, the low number of reviews and moderate rating weaken the commercial validation. The supplier performs better than a low-activity vendor, but the evidence does not support a high-performance classification due to limited feedback volume and only moderate customer rating.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s listed response time is within six hours, which suggests acceptable communication speed for standard sourcing inquiries. However, the dataset does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, OEM/ODM services, packaging customization, or technical customization. Therefore, customization capability cannot be positively assessed based on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale
The response-time performance is reasonable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the supplier should not receive a high score in this category. The evidence supports basic service responsiveness but does not demonstrate advanced service or customization capacity.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is listed as 100.0%, which is a strong delivery indicator. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, orders have been shipped within the expected time frame. No additional details are provided regarding average lead time, logistics options, export destinations, rush-order handling, or historical delivery dispute rates.

Scoring Rationale
According to the stated scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 score range. A 100.0% rate supports a top score within this dimension. While broader logistics data is unavailable, the delivery-performance metric provided is clear and directly supports a strong assessment.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.4
- Review count: 5
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier marked True
- Product or quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.4 store rating, which indicates generally acceptable but not exceptional customer satisfaction. The review count is only 5, meaning the customer feedback sample is too small to strongly validate consistent quality performance. The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some basic confidence in company legitimacy, but the dataset does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality-control processes, inspection reports, defect-rate data, product certifications, or quality-management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile has mixed evidence. The store rating is acceptable, and verified supplier status provides some baseline credibility. However, the very small number of reviews and absence of documented inspection or quality-certification data significantly limit confidence. As a result, the supplier should be scored in the lower-middle range rather than as a strongly validated quality performer.

Final Score: 11 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai Hanyang Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. is conditionally recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing insect-catching, fly-trap, moth-trap, and related pest-control products where platform credibility, Trade Assurance, and delivery reliability are important. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized importers, distributors, online sellers, and buyers seeking moderate transaction history with verified platform backing.

Key risk points include limited customer review volume, only moderate store rating, unclear customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, quality-control systems, and production capacity. Before placing large or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request factory audit details, product compliance documents, inspection procedures, sample testing, and confirmation of customization capabilities. The supplier shows growth potential due to its 12-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value, 60+ recent orders, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate, but further quality and capacity verification is recommended before scaling procurement.