Ningbo Yilun Cosmetic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Yilun Cosmetic Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering plastic coin wallets, coin money boxes, and coin classification products. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, with 21 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a 97.4% on-time delivery rate. Its factory area of 8,600+㎡ indicates a meaningful production footprint, although the reported workforce of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean operating structure. Business activity is moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating of 4.3 with 10+ reviews provides some customer feedback, but the review base remains limited. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking cost-sensitive plastic coin storage products, small-to-medium procurement volumes, and suppliers with long platform history. Key limitations include insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed quality certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 8,600+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively substantial factory area, which suggests available physical production space for plastic product manufacturing and order handling. However, the reported employee count of 20+ staff is comparatively small, indicating that the operation may be lean rather than highly labor-intensive or large-scale. The verified supplier status provides a basic level of factory credibility, but no additional factory certification or audit details are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a stable manufacturing base through its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff size prevents it from being classified as a large-scale supply chain operation. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier fits best into the medium-stability category rather than a large-scale production enterprise.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 21 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform labels: Response time ≤5h; On-time delivery 97.4%

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 21 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong indicator of platform continuity and commercial presence. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves trustworthiness. The available platform labels are operational rather than certification-focused, covering response speed and delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. A 21-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status together form a strong platform credibility profile. The only limitation is that the provided certification or industry label information is not comprehensive beyond operational tags.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has visible transaction activity, with more than 60 orders over the past six months. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates active but not high-volume commercial performance. The store rating of 4.3 is acceptable, though not at a premium satisfaction level. The review count of 10+ provides some buyer validation, but the sample size is limited.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows moderate business validation rather than high-volume market traction. Order volume is reasonable, but transaction value and review count are relatively limited. The rating supports a positive but not outstanding commercial profile.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: Supported by response-time label only

Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time of within five hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization support, OEM/ODM capability, dedicated design support, or technical customization workflow. Therefore, service capability can only be assessed on response speed, not on broader customization strength.

Scoring Rationale
A ≤5h response time is commercially acceptable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the score is limited to a basic-to-normal service level.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.4%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is strong. A 97.4% delivery performance indicates that the supplier has demonstrated reliable fulfillment timing on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery rates above 90% qualify for 9–10 points. At 97.4%, the supplier falls clearly within the highest delivery-performance band.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.3 store rating and 10+ reviews, offering some customer feedback but not a large review base. Verified supplier status provides basic credibility regarding supplier legitimacy. However, there is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality certifications, or formal quality control systems.

Scoring Rationale
The rating is acceptable, and verified supplier status supports basic quality confidence. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of Finished Product Inspection data reduce the strength of the quality assessment. The supplier does not have enough provided evidence to be scored as having a comprehensive quality assurance system.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scope. Ningbo Yilun Cosmetic Appliance Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing plastic coin wallets, coin boxes, and coin classification products at small-to-medium procurement volumes, especially where platform credibility and delivery reliability are important. The supplier’s key strengths are its 21-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and 97.4% on-time delivery rate. Main risks include limited employee scale, modest recent transaction value, limited review volume, and insufficient data on Full Customization and Finished Product Inspection. Growth potential exists if the supplier can provide stronger quality-control documentation, clearer customization capabilities, and more customer feedback evidence.